Belarus 2010: An “internal matter.”
Posted by democratist on December 20, 2010

December 21st 2010.
Democratist is disappointed and upset, but not especially surprised to learn of the results and fallout of yesterday’s presidential election in Belarus.
Since the signing of a series of economic agreements earlier this month, the Russians appear to have decided, in the words of Prime Minister Putin that “the Belarusian leadership has taken a clear course towards integration with Russia,” and suitably mollified, their desire for Lukashenko’s ouster has fallen by the wayside - for the moment at least.
Subsequently, reading between the lines of the OSCE’s sensibly diplomatic preliminary statement (which nonetheless provoked the ire of the newly confident Lukashenko), it appears that it was business as usual for the Belarusian electoral administration over the last few days, and the incumbent has been returned to office with just under 80% of the vote, according to the highly questionable official results.
Subsequently, seven of the nine opposition candidates that stood against Lukashenko have been arrested (including one who was dragged from his hospital bed after a police beating) along with 600 of the several thousand protestors brave enough to demonstrate against this charade of an election in Minsk last night.
While the Belarusian authorities have behaved abominably in both their conduct of the election, and the violent crackdown that has followed it, the reaction of the Russian government has served to underline their own extraordinary cynicism, and more specifically, Dimitry Medvedev’s real attitude towards the democratic process to which he paid so much rhetorical homage earlier this year.
According to Reuters, when asked, Medvedev described the Belarusian elections as an “internal matter,” and did not comment on the police crackdown. He is quoted as saying, “I hope that as a result of these elections, Belarus will continue on the path of creating a modern state based on democracy and friendship with its neighbours.”
And for all its “strong condemnation” of the fraud and violence, and demands that the opposition candidates be freed, the West is left looking weak and ineffectual, with Lukashenko and the Russians the only game in town.
For the time being then, it seems that Belarus will only change when Russia changes its mind about Lukashenko. However, real support for democratization in Belarus (or indeed Russia) in Moscow is lacking, and will continue to be so, regardless of whether Putin or Medvedev wins in 2012.
Belarus: More on the Post-Election Situation · Global Voices said
[...] Democratist and Jamestown Foundation Blog discuss the post-election situation in Belarus; Information Policy writes about the hijacking of “independent media sites” during the election. [...]
Belarus: More on the Post-Election Situation @ Current Affairs said
[...] Democratist and Jamestown Foundation Blog discuss the post-election situation in Belarus; Information Policy writes about the hijacking of “independent media sites” during the election. [...]
Russia Today: No alternative. « Democratist said
[...] in Belarus, before which they provided media and financial support to the opposition, only to cut a deal with Lukashenko at the last-minute, and then describe the polls as an “internal matter” when 600 people (including 7 of [...]
The Enduring Relevance of NATO in “an Asian Age.” « Democratist said
[...] with little regard for democracy or human rights beyond what is politically expedient (just ask a Belarussian). The nomenklatura respects power, and will always be tempted to exploit any perceived European [...]
CSTO: What ya gonna do when they come for you? « Democratist said
[...] energy transit and oil refineries (currently under negotiation), and Lukashenka has been forced to the table by internal political and economic developments. In our estimation, the Russians would almost [...]